Since modern times, the ideal structure of the relationship between individuals and the state has been one in which public nature is established based on the individual’s sense of belonging to the state, that is, the idea of the state. And nation-states assumed responsibility for this for the benefit of their people. Public nature refers to values that concern society as a whole rather than specific individuals, but in the past it was also a value that was open to each and every member of society. Therefore, the collective consciousness of who is a member of society was a prerequisite for thinking about public nature.
However, as globalization progresses, the line between self and others is becoming blurred, and the current situation is that there is a need to realize a comprehensive public nature that includes one’s own group and other groups. And the rulers intent on conquering all existence on Earth are taking full advantage of this opportunity, inciting states and technocracy to carry out harsh covert operations against the commoners.
In fact, “Behind The Green Mask: UN Agenda 21” by Rosa Coale describes Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, as the blueprint, the comprehensive plan of action for the 21st century to inventory and control everything in the world that include,
* all land
* all water
* all plants
* all minerals
* all animals
* all construction
* all means of production
* all energy
* all law enforcement
* all health care
* all food
* all education
* all information
* all human beings
It is well known that the Rockefellers provided their private property for the UN headquarters and that all of the leaders, including the UN Secretary General, are appointed by the rulers, and it is clear that the UN agenda is consistent with the rulers’ plan to turn the Earth into a totalitarian society.
Let’s briefly look back on the history of the relationship between individuals and the state.
Democracy is said to have its origins in the Polis that developed around Athens and Attica in ancient Greece around the 5th century BC, and democracy was only for male citizens, excluding women and slaves. It was introduced in response to the need to evaluate the contribution of Hoplites during the war. In other words, the origins of the democratic system were measures that gave preferential treatment to those who contributed to attacks on hostile forces in order to encourage citizens to cooperate in war.
During the ancient Roman period, around the 3rd century BC, Rome’s territory expanded from the Italian peninsula to the entire Mediterranean region, and the number of foreigners (peregrini) visiting Rome from all over the Mediterranean increased. Because Rome adopted the principle of nationality system, Roman civil law did not apply to foreigners, but the Roman legal system and legal customs were different from those of other countries, so various problems arose. As a result, in addition to the jus civile that applied to Roman citizens, the jus gentium was introduced that applied to everyone. In other words, there was a legal distinction between nationals and foreign nationals.
In medieval Europe, the Christian church came to dominate society, and commoner societies also became fragmented and divided, with distinctions and differentiation from paganism rather than the concept of individuals or nations. For example, as can be seen from the brutality of the Crusades and the Knights Templar, it is clear that differentiation was necessary to justify brutal attacks on pagans and to autocratize the power and authority of the priests.
At the end of the middle ages, the decentralized state structure was replaced by a centralized absolute monarchy with a powerful bureaucracy and standing army. Then, in order to have absolute monarchy as a sovereign nation recognized both inside and outside society, war was justified as a means of realizing national interests. However, the sense of national unity under the absolute monarchy remained unformed or weak.
With the dissolution of intermediate communities within society since modern times, sovereign states were formed in which all regulatory powers were concentrated, and individuals who had been incorporated into intermediate communities were liberated as free individuals. As a result, a dichotomous structure was formed, with the individual gaining freedom and self-identity, and the state monopolizing power and guaranteeing individual freedom.
In the concept of the nation-state, the public for individuals is the state, and the role of the state has continued to expand as individuals seek the guarantee of their survival and rights from the state. In other words, by developing a system in which the state intervenes based on the principle of equality in the relationships between individuals based on the principle of freedom, the survival of the people who make up the state is exclusively guaranteed.
However, since the mid-1980s, the principle of self-responsibility has been placed at the core of society due to malicious covert operations by the rulers. This is because the omnipotence of the state has been intentionally destroyed, the social system has become dysfunctional, and individual freedom has become a human sacrifice for market competition by global corporations. This is clear from the fact that public works that were once owned by the state, such as water and electric power, telecommunications, and public transportation, were all privatized at that time.
It is true that the relationship between individuals and the state brought about by global socialization seems to be heading in a harsh direction for the commoners.
For example,
* Introduction of a system of international society that restricts national sovereignty. (e.g. SDGs and ESG)
* The emergence of norms and compliance related to universal human rights. (e.g. One Health)
* Unrest due to covert operations by rulers regarding the national classifications that form the basis of nation-states. (e.g. strict surveillance socialization, financial and food crisis)
Since ancient times, the rulers have been adept at manipulating the commoners by exploiting and stimulating group psychology, and Hitler’s tactics were a typical example. This is because even if people have an individual identity, if their belief system is constrained and manipulated by religion, they will lose their sense of self and become subservient to that system as a crowd according to the ruler’s intentions.
In fact, the satanic rulers have strengthened their control power by recruiting the commoners into religious cults and disrupting the health and sanity of commoner communities and societies.
Druidism, which has continued since B.C., has changed into Zoroastrianism, Gnosticism, Manichaeism, etc., and is still inherited today in the worship of the satan (Lucifer) by the rulers and their stakeholders. Furthermore, the origin of Gnosticism, which is based on dualism such as the true God and false gods, is disputed, but it already existed in the second half of the first century after Christ’s death. Especially during the Middle Ages, Gnostics were persecuted as heretics, but even today they are associated with the ruling class, as the G in the Freemasonry logo has the meaning of Gnosticism.
There is a theory that Paul interpreted Christianity in a mystical way and introduced Gnostic thought, but Gnosticism, as a heresy, became the basis of Western occult tradition and played a role in secretly leading people to worship Lucifer. Therefore, it can be seen that there is a connection with the Illuminati.
Moreover, the ruling class of the middle ages, such as the royal lineage and the descendants of the genocidal Knights Templar, did not naturally disappear with the passage of time. It is no doubt that they still reign as a ruling class today and play a role in constant attacks on the commoners based on the rituals of their satanic worship. In fact, the reality of the British royal family’s satanic worship is evident from the appearance of Baphomet’s face in the mirror image of King Charles’ red portrait.
In addition, O.T.O. (Ordo Templi Orientis), which was founded under the leadership of Aleister Crowley (1875~1947) and centered on Christian Gnosticism, is a successor to the Knights Templar and an affiliate of Freemasonry. Furthermore, Crowley was a member of the Illuminati who worshiped Bahomet, and Crowley’s friend Lafayette Ronald Hubbard, a New Age science fiction writer, also participated in the Satanic rituals.
OTO’s Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (EGC) and Scientology, founded by Ron Hubbard, are fellow cults, and as they are intelligence agencies connected to the CIA, it is clear that they have Moonies and Soka under their control as implementation forces. Scientology’s doctrine was spelled out in the Georgia Guidestones, which have the same shape as their headquarters building, but its primary plan, the depopulation of the commoner class, is currently underway through virus turmoil and lethal mRNA vaccines.
Furthermore, since OTO promotes twisted tantrism based on homosexuality, it can be seen that it is in line with the social reform plan promoted by the satan worshipers such as WEF. Additionally, New Age transhumanists believe that the ultimate evolution of humanity lies in the merging of humans and machines, and are attempting to implant brain chips into the commoners that will enable the incorporation of human consciousness into artificial intelligence. In other words, the rulers are trying to move the commoners into the Metaverse to govern and control them.
Let’s go back to the topic of individuals and state at the beginning.
The state as a contrast to the individual can also be replaced by power, system, crowd, etc. The commoners were liberated as members of the nation and were promised freedom, equality, and security. However, while these are in a binary opposition to each other, they also have a structure in which they cancel each other out as a whole. Therefore, the more an individual tries to remain rational or seeks freedom from the system, the more these items become a factor that causes conflict, fragmentation, and division between the individual and the state, or among commoners.
As an example of this, according to French thinker Alexis de Tocqueville (1805~1859), when equality is pursued to extremes, it can lead to a concentration of power and, as a result, a violation of individual freedom. The background to this was the French Revolution, when commoners overemphasized the idea of equality in reaction to the privileged classes such as the king, the nobility, and the clergy. As a result, a totalitarian state was formed based on strict enforcement of anything that lacked equality, leading to a situation where individual freedom was threatened.
Totalitarianism is an ideology that prioritizes the interests of the whole over the interests of the individual, and that the individual must be subordinated for the sake of the whole. Therefore, the freedom and actions of the people will be restricted in order to achieve the overall objective. Furthermore, worldviews, narratives, and ideologies arbitrarily created by the charismatic leader or the authorities incite the nation. On the other hand, those who disagree with the national policy will be thoroughly eliminated as resisters.
Therefore, under totalitarianism, the following tactics are used to control the thoughts and actions of the people. Ref: The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) by Hannah Arendt.
* Brainwashing with propaganda
Induct into a specific ideology through mass media, etc.
* Control of free speech
Prohibiting certain speech, such as criticizing a nation or affirming an enemy nation
* Violent ruling system
Capturing and punishing resisters who oppose the state
Arendt explained the trigger that led to totalitarianism in terms of the atomization of the masses.
Arendt says that before the rise of totalitarianism, the citizens of nation-states had become masses. This means that the nationalism of the “we-consciousness” that had supported the nation-state had collapsed due to the development of class society and capitalist economy, and the masses had already been born.
According to her, citizens are people who belong to a particular class or occupational classification and are aware of their own interests. On the other hand, the masses are people with weak connections, whose own interests are unclear, and who are vaguely insecure.
In other words, Arendt defined the masses as the people who did not belong to any of the groups that increased with the social changes of the time, and called this phenomenon atomization, which was a preparatory stage for the arrival of totalitarianism.
This is not just something that happened a while ago, but can also be applied to today’s society.
In fact, in the wake of the virus turmoil and lockdown, many ordinary people began to feel anxious about an uncertain and vague future, and connections between the commoners were severed, but a distorted mass society that bowed to power was formed. As a result, easy-to-understand worldviews and sweet traps were presented to the masses, who were made up of careless commoners, and the rulers’ malicious strategies toward totalitarian socialization became even more radical.
e.g.: Destruction of the natural environment in the name of protecting the earth, the lie that toxic mRNA vaccines provide immunity to disease X.
Gustave Le Bon (1841~1931), in his The Psychology of Crowds (1895), warned that anyone’s intelligence would decline if they were surrounded by the excitement of a crowd. Incidentally, this book is said to have been used by Hitler as a reference for inciting the masses.
The following are possible reasons why individuals who belong to a crowd have a marked decline in their ability to make judgments, make irrational decisions, become susceptible to suggestion, or deviate from their innate humanity.
1. Individuals in a crowd feel an irresistible force or peer pressure simply by the fact that they are in the crowd. By acting like other people in the crowd, they try to establish their own identity as one of their peers.
2. Mental infection, or any action or emotion becomes more contagious. People gain psychological benefits, satisfaction, security, and a sense of belonging by belonging to a group. This sense of belonging is an important element in forming one’s identity as a member of a group.
3. Suggestibility is the tendency to be influenced by the opinions and actions of others, and in a crowd, suggestions are the same for all individuals, so they interact with each other.
Hitler skillfully used rhetorical techniques, including the following seven points:
1. Guiding selection using contrast method
By putting the two in a contrasting relationship and highlighting the contrast, we encourage people to choose one.
2. Suppress objections with assertiveness
3. Repeat
The combination of the parallel method and contrast method is strongly and deeply engraved in one’s memory.
4. Use hyperbole
Superlative expressions and generic expressions.
5. Use the subjunctive mood to force direction.
Make convenient assumptions and lead to convenient consequences.
6. Appeal to the five senses with metaphors
Treat something as a known fact and have it understood and recognized through that known fact.
7. Use euphemisms
Use beautifying language, use less offensive expressions, replace with positive expressions, and use abstract words frequently.
Unconditional assertions that are free from reasoning or argumentation are a surefire way to instill ideas into the minds of crowds. Assertions do not require evidence or argument, and the more concise they are, the more powerful they become.
Humans are said to be imitative by nature, and imitation in social phenomena is simply the result of contagion. Therefore, the rulers are maliciously taking full advantage of this phenomenon in which when a small number of individuals take action, the unconscious majority imitates it.
Hitler made full use of the knowledge gained from Le Bon’s books as a tactic of mass incitement. Incidentally, Napoleon also said that there is only one true rhetorical form, and that is repetition.
In other words, those who know how to bestow illusions on the crowd become the masters of the crowd, and those who attempt to break the crowd’s illusions always become the crowd’s sacrifices.
In any case, the rulers have always manipulated the minds of individuals through methods such as authority, assertion, subversion, and infection, ensnaring them into communal illusions, and leading them to become anti-intellectual crowds. Moreover, rulers are constantly creating various conflict structures in commoner society, instilling negative psychological tendencies and cognitive biases based on exclusion and division, and trying to confine individuals in crowds.
The absurdity depicted as a theme by writers such as Camus (1913-1960), Kafka (1883-1924), and Kobo Abe (1924-1993) was the dilemma and conflict between the individual and the powerful force that exceeds the individual. The powers that transcend the individual include nations, systems, crowds, masses, and societies.
The protagonist of Camus’s The Stranger (1942) expresses his grief over his mother’s death in a different way than those around him, and as a result, he is treated as a stranger, estranged from the masses who act according to social customs and beliefs.
To summarize a little, the main character is walking alone on the beach when a mob tries to attack him, holding a knife. The protagonist, who is unable to see anything but the sun and the reflection of a knife due to the sweat running down his eyelids, shoots and kills a mobster.
At trial, the judge questions the fact that there was a pause between the first of the five shots the protagonist fired and the next four. Furthermore, during the trial, the protagonist’s outlook on life and ethics are questioned, and his loneliness and apathy come to the fore through his creepy behavior, lack of emotion, and sense of distance from reality, and his very existence is treated as absurd.
As a result, because the protagonist did not cry at his mother’s funeral and did not know his mother’s age, he was labeled as a ruthless and violent person who planned the crime in advance.
The protagonist defends himself by saying that he did not intend to take his life in advance. When asked by the judge about the motive behind the second and subsequent shots, the protagonist says it was because of the sun, which causes laughter in the courtroom.
The judge asks him if he believes in God, and when the protagonist replies that he doesn’t, the judge forces him to believe in God and becomes hysterical.
Although the lawyer argued that the crime was an impulsive act, stating that the protagonist is a hard-working person who is loved by others, the capital punishment was handed down.
While waiting for his execution date, the protagonist repeatedly refuses to meet with the priest, telling him that he has confidence in his life when he asks for his faith. The protagonist felt as an individual that he was and is still happy.
To avoid spoilers, I will end the summary of the story here, the protagonist lives according to his own senses and intuition, unconstrained by society’s norms and expectations. This attitude leads to emphasizing the theme of absurdity in the relationship between the protagonist and the social environment, the system, and the crowd.
Therefore, the absurdity is a state of sin against an individual who deviates from the conventional wisdom of the crowd, and it seems that this essentially defines the individual. It is true that in modern society, the more you break away from the crowd and pursue your own individual identity, the more you are likely to be treated as some sort of criminal by the rulers, leading to a life of irrationality.
Kobo Abe’s The Wall – S. Karma’s Crime (1951) depicts the theme that one can escape existential anxiety and protect oneself as an individual, but at the same time one is alienated from society, isolated, and the wall that serves as a boundary grows.
To summarize the concept of the story, in mass society, a name is given to the self of body and mind, and a symbolic self is formed. The unity of these should form the identity of an individual, but the symbolic self is more dominant in society than the physical and mental self. Therefore, if we lose the relationship between body-mind and name, we will lose the right to exist in society, and the body-mind self will instinctively build a wall. The wall can protect the self, but the mass society alienates the self. Furthermore, the self, who has lost the identification symbol called a name and wandered into another world, becomes isolated due to the strange eyes of those around him, the intrusive intruders, and the unreasonable trial. In order to protect himself from the attacks of mass society, the self shuts himself up inside a wall, but that the wall gradually grows larger and larger. Eventually, the self becomes the wall himself.
The personal dilemma that arises from the dichotomy between the individual and mass society can also be seen in this story. The more one tries to be true to oneself, the more one searches for one’s own identity, the more one pursues one’s own originality, the more one becomes alienated within the nation or mass society.
Arendt put it this way: “Social atomization and extreme individualization preceded the mass movement. The chief characteristic of the mass man is not brutality and backwardness, but his isolation and lack of normal social relationships.”
Totalitarianism is a state in which no contradiction to the dominant ideology of society is allowed to exist, there is no tolerance for individual freedom or independent thought, and the regime exerts great control over the masses through its systems and methods, completely subjugating and directing every aspect of each individual’s life.
Fear is the primary driving force behind constant anxiety and activity throughout society. The establishment and perpetuation of totalitarianism therefore depends on mass support, which is gained by exploiting a perpetual sense of crisis and fear in society. It cultivates isolated, self-centered individuals with no clear, overarching purpose in life, presents the deception of creating and maintaining a sense of community purpose, and creates a mass of isolated individuals who will forever support the solutions proposed by the absolute leader.
What accelerates mass formation is not so much the frustration and aggression that are effectively vented, but the potential of unvented aggression present in the population—aggression that is still looking for an object. Therefore, there is a clear correlation between people who are lonely, have lost the meaning of life, and are plagued by anxiety, and the tendency of commoners to attack each other because of frustration, insults, and criticism.
Meanwhile, it is also true that advances in science and technology, the rise of mechanistic thinking, and the spread of the Internet have created conditions that make it easier for lonely individuals to form virtual masses, and this has rapidly permeated society. As a result, the rulers’ malicious tactics have cut off the commoners from healthy natural and social environments, fundamentally depriving them of the meaning and purpose of their lives, and leading to an increase in floating-anxiety, frustration, and aggression.
The transformation into a totalitarian society was not just a chatterbox theory or a historical coincidence, but a reality that is being steadily driven by the intentions and desires of the rulers.
Through his perspective on the absurd, Camus made us realize the importance of recognizing and accepting absurdity, and living creatively as individuals to overcome our own limitations.
Awakening from absurdity and collective illusions, and the pursuit of individuality and the maintenance of one’s mental and physical health, will also lead to contributing to the weakened society as a deterrent and resistance against the tyranny of the rulers.
Sincerely grateful for your financial support.
Sources and references:
AI Systems Now Taking Control of Cars, Phones and YOU
vs.
Who is the head of the snake behind the Great Reset, Covid and Global Warming hoaxes?
The Machinery of Fascism Revisited
Our Freedom Has Gone – Probably Forever
Digital IDs Simultaneously Rolled Out by Multiple WEF-Infiltrated Govt’s
Neuralink Receives FDA Approval To Implant Brain Chip In Second Patient
THE SILVER BULLET FOR DEFENDING YOUR HEALTH
Top Cancer Surgeon Blows the Whistle: ‘Ivermectin Cures Cancer’
vs.
The Names & Faces of the Bilderbergers Who Manipulated the COVID-19 Pandemic Response
Doctors Ordered To Euthanize MILLIONS of Vaxxed to Cover-Up ‘Disturbing’ Side Effects
Japanese Medical Professor Warns The World About Dangerous ‘Self Replication Replicon’ Jabs
Gates Foundation Insider Admits ‘The Pandemic Was a Hoax’
Google (and YouTube) funded COVID-19 bioweapon development, study reveals
One Health, Gaia Worship, Wicca and Neo-Paganism
WHO Needs A Treaty? “One Health” Is Already Firmly Established In America
Bird flu is man-made, that’s why they already have a vaccine for it
HAARP’s Aurora Switch Was Turned On Last Week To Create “Artificial Airglows”
WHO Ties Up With CERN For Global Pandemic Surveillance Tool
‘Baphomet’ Face Revealed in Mirrored Image of King Charles’ Satanic Royal Portrait
vs.
Occultism, child trafficking and Harry Houdini’s personal fight against both
United Nations and World Invocation Day: A day to invoke satan and the antichrist
